Rebellion has mounted among EU countries over an international energy treaty that gives multinationals the power to sue governments, as the Netherlands became the third country to announce plans to withdraw from a pact it says stymies plans to tackle climate change. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Netherlands joined a move last week by Spain, following in the footsteps of Poland, in preparing to exit the Energy Charter Treaty that was intended to protect international energy investments by foreign companies or individuals. Italy withdrew in 2016 but remains bound by a 20-year sunset clause. Campaigners say the pact, designed in the 1990s to encourage post-cold war investment, has become an obstacle to curbing the greenhouse gases produced by coal, oil and gas projects. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Investors may sue governments if they believe their assets are under threat from legislation or policy changes. The treaty covers more than 50 countries, including the EU as a bloc. The Dutch government said on Tuesday that the treaty was not aligned with the Paris climate accord goal of limiting global warming to \u201cwell below\u201d 2C, and ideally 1.5C, since pre-industrial times. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Three energy groups, including Germany\u2019s RWE, are suing three European governments over decisions to mandate the closure of coal power plants, prevent the development of specific projects or require an environmental impact assessment. RWE targeted the Netherlands over the country\u2019s decision to phase out coal-fired generation by 2030. The company announced this month that it would end coal-fired electricity generation in Germany by 2030, but it said it would not drop the case against the Dutch. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In August, the UK\u2019s Rockhopper won about \u20ac250mn in a case it filed against Italy over a proposed oilfield in the Adriatic Sea. Despite its withdrawal from the treaty, Italy remains subject to a clause that binds those that leave to its rules for a further 20 years. A process to \u201cmodernise\u201d the pact has been under way since 2018, and campaigners have said the revised text must end protections for fossil fuel investments. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
An agreement in principle was reached in June, but the text, which is yet to be ratified, would continue to protect coal, oil and gas investments in the EU and UK for 10 years after it comes into force. It would also protect new fossil fuel investments made before August 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Read the complete article on Financial Times:<\/p>\n\n\n\n